论文全文 - 第28届CIMAC会议 未指定分类
该论文已在赫尔辛基举行的第28届CIMAC大会上发表,论文的版权归CIMAC所有。Recent trends in gas engine design have focused on improving power output and efficiency while reducing emissions. Despite the fact that gas engines may be similar to other engines in their appearance and specifications, lubrication requirement of a gas engine is quite different from the conventional diesel or gasoline engine, owing to their higher combustion temperatures, engine loads and very different engine operation. Gas engines operate at high temperatures greater than 200 °C. At these high temperatures, especially, in a piston environment, lubricating oil is prone to severe thermal oxidation. Nitration is the most common route cause for many maladies of a gas engine lubricant which occurs due to the reaction of the oil with the oxides of nitrogen (NOX) generated during combustion. Several engine operating factors which will contribute to nitration are air to fuel ratio, load, cylinder liner temperatures, blow-by ingress, poor crankcase ventilation etc. Impact of nitration on lubricant would be excessive sludge/varnish formation, premature oil thickening, insoluble increase and ring and liner wear. To sustain these operational eventualities, natural gas engine lubricants are to be robust in nature. This robustness is important to achieve longer drain potentials which is one of the customer demand, as frequent oil changes not only pushes up the oil bill but also will lead to consequential power loss arising out of shut downs. Oils not properly designed specifically for gas engines can reduce head rebuild cycles, filter plugging and accelerate ring and liner wear.
Natural Gas Engine Oils are classified according to their ash content- low, medium and high. Ash comes from the detergent additives used in these formulations. While too low an ash leads to valve seat recession, to high an ash leads to valve guttering and torching. Hence optimum balance is to be achieved. Since gaseous fuel per se is much cleaner and devoid of sulphur compared to liquid fuels, low ash (<0.6% Wt) is generally preferred for these oils. Regarding base oils, API Gp. II base oils –hydro-treated, branched paraffinic- are more preferred owing to their higher oxidation stability than Gp. I oils. Gp.III oils, though are more oxidatively stable, may not be suitable because of their lower viscosity. Further, lubricants based on off-the shelf additive packages from various additive suppliers may not be as robust as they ought to be.
The present paper describes the development of a new generation, component based, low ash natural gas engine oil for stationary gas engines formulated with API Gp.II base oil. Performance assessment methodology devised involves effective lab screening tests, with each test simulating a condition that the oil would experience in service. Selection of test methods involve adoption of those severe deposit formation tests which are commonly used for passenger car and heavy duty diesel engine segments- where pass/fail criteria and test conditions for these parameters are far more severe. Three types of thermo-oxidation tests – static, bubbling oxygen, dynamic catalytic oxidation tests were used coupled with blotter test to establish the oxidation stability of the oil. A specially designed nitration bench test was employed to assess the oil resistance to degradation from nitration. Friction, wear and film strength characteristics were screened in widely accepted tribological test rigs. All the test data were benchmarked against a very high industry reference oil. The candidate oil delivers better performance than industry reference product in tests related to Nitration, Oxidation, Deposits, Corrosion, TBN Retention, Acid Control, Wear, Film Thickness, Friction and Sludge Dispersancy. Single cylinder engine tests were conducted to demonstrate that the formulation offers superior control of deposits and bearing corrosion protection.
查看